Optimisus
BTC—— ETH—— SOL—— BNB—— XRP——
LIVE MARKET
Crypto News

One in Three ETH Is Now Staked. A New Proposal Would Cut Those Rewards to Nothing

By · · 6 min read
One in Three ETH Is Now Staked. A New Proposal Would Cut Those Rewards to Nothing

Ethereum staking has never been higher. It has also never paid worse.

Both statements are true at the same time, and they are not a coincidence. They are the same fact viewed from two ends.

Validator queue data showed about 41.4 million ETH locked in consensus as of August 4. That is roughly 34% of total supply, a record for the network.

More than 1.4 million ETH went in during a single week. Then, on August 4, six researchers filed a draft proposal that would eventually burn what those validators earn.

Why Record Participation Means Record Compression

Ethereum issues a fixed pool of consensus rewards. More validators sharing that pool means less for each one. The math is not complicated and it is not avoidable.

The seven-day staking APR has fallen to around 2.66%, down from a peak above 5% in June 2023. That is a decline of nearly half over three years.

You will see higher numbers quoted elsewhere. Figures of 3% to 3.8% are common, and they are not wrong. They include execution-layer tips and MEV on top of the base consensus rate.

So the honest answer depends on what you are counting. Base issuance yield is under 3%. Total validator income for a well-run setup lands higher.

What EIP-8363 Would Actually Do

The proposal is titled Tapered Issuance Burn. It would progressively destroy a share of consensus-layer validator rewards as the staking ratio climbs.

The burn scales upward. It reaches 100% once roughly 60.25 million ETH is staked, which is close to half of current supply. At that point issuance yield hits zero.

Validators would still earn something. Tips and MEV would remain. But roughly 85% of current staking rewards come from consensus issuance, so the remaining slice is thin.

The phase-in runs about 18 months. Cryptopolitan calculated that activating it today would drop validator income from about 2.68% to around 1.19%, a cut of roughly 55%.

MetricNowUnder the proposal at 50% staked
ETH stakedabout 41.4 millionabout 60.25 million
Share of supplyabout 34%about 50%
Consensus issuance burned0%100%
Validator issuance yieldabout 2.66%0%
Remaining validator incomeissuance plus tips and MEVtips and MEV only

The Naming Problem Nobody Has Cleaned Up

There is genuine confusion in the coverage about which proposal is which, and it is worth flagging rather than papering over.

Most outlets are reporting this as EIP-8363. Crypto.news noted that the mechanism described actually matches EIP-8361, a separate Tapered Issuance Burn draft it had covered earlier.

COINOTAG treats them as two distinct proposals with different thresholds, and reports that a validator survey on EIP-8361 returned 99.77% opposition.

Both remain drafts. Neither has been approved for inclusion in a network upgrade. Readers tracking this should check the EIP number on the actual GitHub pull request rather than trusting a headline.

Who Is Fighting It

Joseph Chalom, chief executive of SharpLink and a former BlackRock executive, came out against the proposal on August 7. SharpLink is the second-largest publicly traded Ethereum treasury company.

His argument runs through DeFi rather than through validator profit. Staking yield functions as a base rate for on-chain lending markets, and liquid staking tokens sit as collateral across those markets.

SharpLink puts that collateral base at roughly $35 billion in total value locked. Cut the base rate, Chalom argues, and the cost of on-chain capital rises while lending markets thin out.

He also framed it as a competitive question. Native yield is one of the clearest things Ethereum offers that Bitcoin does not, and removing it removes an institutional reason to hold ETH.

Aave founder Stani Kulechov joined the opposition, calling the proposal harmful and warning it would make yields unpredictable. Lido’s head of staking argued it tries to solve several problems at once and may achieve the opposite of each.

The Case on the Other Side

Supporters are not making a yield argument. They are making a centralization argument.

Large custodial operators can run validators at very thin margins. Solo stakers and mid-sized operators cannot. Capping the staking ratio, in this view, prevents the validator set from consolidating into a handful of institutions.

There is also a dilution point. Burning issuance reduces new supply entering the market.

Messari pushed back on the premise. Its analysts noted Ethereum’s annual issuance already sits near 0.85%, called the proposal a solution in search of a problem, and rated its odds of passing as low.

Chalom himself conceded the odds are long. His concern was that the proposal exists at all, at a moment when institutional flows are building.

What This Means for the Market Right Now

Nothing has changed mechanically. No burn is active. The near-term effect is on sentiment and on how treasury companies plan.

The liquidity picture is the more immediate story. Every ETH moved into staking is ETH removed from tradable float, which amplifies price moves in both directions.

Corporate accumulation is compounding that. BitMine has continued adding, having previously disclosed ETH holdings reaching 5.54 million tokens, with the large majority of it staked rather than liquid.

Large unstaking events cut the other way, as Optimisus noted when a Tron co-founder unstaked $56 million of ETH through Lido.

Thin float meeting weak stablecoin liquidity is a specific combination. Optimisus examined that second half in why stablecoin supply is shrinking while usage sets records.

ETH traded around $1,920 on Monday, holding above the $1,900 level it spent much of July trying to reclaim.

The Queue Tells Its Own Story

Entry queue figures diverge depending on who is measuring. One reading has ETH waiting to enter contracting from 4.11 million to 2.40 million. CoinDesk reported roughly 2.5 million still queued, with a wait of six weeks or more.

The direction is consistent even if the number is not. People are still lining up to stake, and almost nobody is lining up to leave.

That is the awkward part for the proposal’s timing. It targets a ceiling the network is moving toward steadily, under yields that have already halved, and validators keep joining anyway.

The staking design has been reshaped before without breaking, most recently when Ethereum completed the Pectra upgrade. This one would change what validators are paid, not just how they operate.

Sources

This is not financial advice.

Optimisus covers crypto and technology news for readers who want the detail behind the headline.

Optimisus

Optimisus is a Web3 media company that covers the latest cryptocurrency, NFT, metaverse, blockchain, and Fintech news influencing the crypto industry.

Related Articles